Tuesday, November 30, 2010
German book chapter publication announcement
The Germany Cologne based ANA Publishers (vertrieb@anapublishers.de . www.ANApublishers.de) announced the publication of a book Marneros, Andereas; Rohde, Anke, Hgg.: Festschrift zum achtzigsten Geburstag von Professor Peters [a temporary title], in which on pages 64-93 there is a publication of a chapter entitled Das Hintergrundwissen, written and successfully presented in German by Professor Potrc at the occasion of this year's symposium honoring Dr. Uwe Peters.
Monday, November 22, 2010
Austere Realism review link
TannerTOC: November 15-19, 2010
By Molly
Terence E. Horgan and Matjaz Potrc. Austere Realism: Contextual Semantics Meets Minimal Ontology. Review by Jacek Brzozowski. Graham Priest. An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is. Review by Sam Butchart. ...
TannerTOC - http://tannertoc.blogspot.com/
By Molly
Terence E. Horgan and Matjaz Potrc. Austere Realism: Contextual Semantics Meets Minimal Ontology. Review by Jacek Brzozowski. Graham Priest. An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is. Review by Sam Butchart. ...
TannerTOC - http://tannertoc.blogspot.com/
Sunday, November 14, 2010
The Ought and the Ship
The visit to Milan Italy was successful. First, there was an encounter with Emanuele Marini and with his family in Rovello Porro. Then, the two day symposium on oughts and philosophy of law at the Milano University, with Paolo di Lucia, Venanzio Raspa, Giuseppe Lorini, of course Emanuele Marini, and many others. Veber's and Slovene oughts discovery in the meinongian theory of objects was highlighted and reviewed. Plans are made for a gathering on this topics in July. After that, there was a visit to Villa Borromeo with attendance to the memorable lecture of Armando Verdiglione on the topics of the Ship. This morning I have a talk on the Reality of Fiction in Ljubljana, and as far as the narration goes, I will begin by mentioning the stories related to the ship. Photo: Matjaz in Villa Borromeo.
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Milan Italy November 2010 and dealing with Meinongian ontology
On Thursday November 11 I participate in a symposium dedicated to the Meinongian philosophy of oughts, with my and Vojko's paper Where Do Oughts Come From? The occasion at the Universita degli Studi di Milano, Facolta di Giurisprudenza, is presentation of Emanuele Marini's thesis on Uomo, dovere, etica nella filosofia di France Veber (1890-1975). [You can access this PhD text if you browse some Emanuele Marini related stuff in this blog.] Besides to Emanuele whose knowledge of Slovene language and Veber is excellent, there will be also Venanzio Raspa with his presentation of Meinongian Sollen. Everything will happen in Italian language. After that, I look forward to the Villa Borromeo Verdiglione lecture, before returning home and delivering Dejanskost pripovedi lecture on Monday November 15th at 11:20h room 434 Filozofska fakulteta Ljubljana. This will end a two weeks intensive Meinongian engagement that started with the visit of Seppo Sajama from Finland. (You may wonder what is cooking in the background in terms of further plans. Here is a preliminary announcement: detailed study and presentation of the forthcoming Epistemological Spectrum Henderson and Horgan book in preparation of the Bled May 30-June 3 conference, Brain in a Vat Phenomenology and much more.)
By the way, I enjoyed my yesterday lecture on the Meinongian roots of analytic philosophy. My insight was that dealing with Meinong is at the very basis of analytic philosophy, the analysis of sentences being proposed in Russell paper On Denoting (1905) in order to supposedly get rid of Meinongian unreal objects. The adequacy surface structure of some sentences, such as The actual king of France is bald, Ponce de Leon was searching for the fountain of youth, is measured by its fitting to the underlying deeper metaphysical structure (cf.: neither the actual king of France nor the fountain of youth exist in the real world). Both Russell and Meinong stick to the direct correspondence theory of truth, differing just in restriction of possible realms to the actual stuff in the case of the first one. We propose truth as indirect correspondence approach to the matter, and following Terry Horgan, a propositional ersatzist metaphysical interpretation of noneist semantics. Some time ago, myself and Vojko Strahovnik proposed, in a similar direction, to counter the competence based performance error of the Meinongian ultimate ontology engagement into revealing the simple truth that these subsistent and impossible worlds are not the ultimate ontological guys but creatures of language and thought. Meinongians get blocked in their ability to recognize this simple fact by their competence based performance error. Actually we think that their error is a quite a natural fact of life and may get explained by this approach of ours. My lecture will be available on the net in a due time on my homepage, besides to other video lectures stuff already available there. Meinongian scorekeeping paper draft may be found under this link: http://www2.arnes.si/~supmpotr/clanki.html
Photo: Professors Paolo di Lucia, Venanzio Raspa, Giuseppe Lorini, Matjaz Potrc at Universita degli Studi di Milano, law department.
By the way, I enjoyed my yesterday lecture on the Meinongian roots of analytic philosophy. My insight was that dealing with Meinong is at the very basis of analytic philosophy, the analysis of sentences being proposed in Russell paper On Denoting (1905) in order to supposedly get rid of Meinongian unreal objects. The adequacy surface structure of some sentences, such as The actual king of France is bald, Ponce de Leon was searching for the fountain of youth, is measured by its fitting to the underlying deeper metaphysical structure (cf.: neither the actual king of France nor the fountain of youth exist in the real world). Both Russell and Meinong stick to the direct correspondence theory of truth, differing just in restriction of possible realms to the actual stuff in the case of the first one. We propose truth as indirect correspondence approach to the matter, and following Terry Horgan, a propositional ersatzist metaphysical interpretation of noneist semantics. Some time ago, myself and Vojko Strahovnik proposed, in a similar direction, to counter the competence based performance error of the Meinongian ultimate ontology engagement into revealing the simple truth that these subsistent and impossible worlds are not the ultimate ontological guys but creatures of language and thought. Meinongians get blocked in their ability to recognize this simple fact by their competence based performance error. Actually we think that their error is a quite a natural fact of life and may get explained by this approach of ours. My lecture will be available on the net in a due time on my homepage, besides to other video lectures stuff already available there. Meinongian scorekeeping paper draft may be found under this link: http://www2.arnes.si/~supmpotr/clanki.html
Photo: Professors Paolo di Lucia, Venanzio Raspa, Giuseppe Lorini, Matjaz Potrc at Universita degli Studi di Milano, law department.
Thank you Atkins
In span of eight weeks approximately there is a new me. Trousers shrunk for several units. Thank you Atkins! Now on with the lifetime maintenance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)